Maine Supreme Court Rules That Anti-CMP Corridor Referendum Signatures Were Valid

  MAY 7, 2020

The Supreme Judicial Court Thursday rejected a former CMP employee's claim that thousands of signatures submitted by opponents to get the referendum question on the statewide ballot should be invalidated.

CMP's political action committee also claimed opponents acted illegally. Jon Breed is executive director of "Clean Energy Matters."

"In the face of clear forgery, fraud and conflicts of interest, we raised concerns. And while we disagree ultimately with the Secretary of state's interpretation of the notary law, we respect the Supreme Court's decision."

Tom Saviello is a leader with the Say No to the CMP Corridor coalition.

"I'm very happy the people of the state of Maine will have a voice on this corridor, and that's despite all of CMP's efforts to silence them."

The project would bring hydro-electricity from Canada into the regional grid to serve customers in Massachusetts. The court ruled that opponents did not violate state law by allowing some notaries who certified petition signatures to do other work specifically against the project.

CMP has spent millions of dollars on lobbying, advertising and legal expenses aimed at building support and beating back opposition to the 145-mile transmission line. A spokesperson for it's political PAC said today it would work "tirelessly" to win at the ballot box.


Be the first to comment

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.