Rose LTE: Power for the people, not large corporations

Bangor Daily News

I believe an ad by Hydro-Quebec stokes fear that the people – as in the “We the People” – might have some say in planning our energy future rather than leave that planning to the “experts.” Here’s the deal: I think these are experts whose interests are incompatible with “We the People” and are serving some other interest. No surprise that this other interest is wealth – those who have much of it and want much more.

There is an alternative way, a democratic way, to develop electrical infrastructure in this world and in this state without fragmenting habitats and crisscrossing natural landscapes. Efficient and affordable homestead-scale energy generation and storage technologies can be prioritized in developing our energy future. Interconnected single homes and microgrids can wrest control of our electricity usage from privately governed for-profit entities, like Iberdrola, as they hover above democracy and trickle to us commoners their pitiful portfolio of bad management, poor service and reliability while lavishing themselves and their investors with maximized unearned incomes.

Jevons paradox” observes that technological gains in efficiency tend to be outpaced by demand to consume. I believe the biggest threat to environmental sustainability is the insatiable appetite of the wealthy to consume. The most environmental choice is yes on Question 1 to stop the corridor.

Eben Rose

South Portland

Showing 3 reactions

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • Eben Rose
    commented 2021-10-23 08:04:39 -0400
    Here’s the letter I submitted to the BDN without their editorial staff changing it:

    An ad by HydroQuebec stokes fear that the people– as in the “We the People”– might have some say in planning our energy future rather than leave that planning to the “experts”. Here’s the deal: experts whose interests are incompatible with “We the People” are serving some other interest. No surprise that this other interest is wealth– those who have much of it and want much more. Those anonymous wealthy interests benefit the most from the CMP Corridor and who are behind it. They do not know this land like those who live in it, who work in it, and who explore it and want to preserve it.

    There is an alternative way, a democratic way, to develop electrical infrastructure in this world and in this state without fragmenting habitats and crisscrossing natural landscapes with permanent, pesticide-soaked industrial rope burns. Efficient and affordable homestead-scale energy generation and storage technologies can be prioritized in developing our energy future. Interconnected single homes and microgrids can wrest control of our electricity usage from privately governed for-profit entities, like Iberdrola, as they hover above democracy and trickle to us commoners their pitiful portfolio of bad management, poor service and reliability while lavishing themselves and their investors with maximized unearned incomes.

    “Jevons paradox” observes that technological gains in efficiency tend to be outpaced by demand to consume. The biggest threat to environmental sustainability is the insatiable appetite of the wealthy to consume. The most environmental choice is YES on Question 1 to stop the corridor.
  • Eben Rose
    commented 2021-10-23 08:04:28 -0400
    Here’s the letter I submitted to the BDN without their editorial staff changing it:

    An ad by HydroQuebec stokes fear that the people– as in the “We the People”– might have some say in planning our energy future rather than leave that planning to the “experts”. Here’s the deal: experts whose interests are incompatible with “We the People” are serving some other interest. No surprise that this other interest is wealth– those who have much of it and want much more. Those anonymous wealthy interests benefit the most from the CMP Corridor and who are behind it. They do not know this land like those who live in it, who work in it, and who explore it and want to preserve it.

    There is an alternative way, a democratic way, to develop electrical infrastructure in this world and in this state without fragmenting habitats and crisscrossing natural landscapes with permanent, pesticide-soaked industrial rope burns. Efficient and affordable homestead-scale energy generation and storage technologies can be prioritized in developing our energy future. Interconnected single homes and microgrids can wrest control of our electricity usage from privately governed for-profit entities, like Iberdrola, as they hover above democracy and trickle to us commoners their pitiful portfolio of bad management, poor service and reliability while lavishing themselves and their investors with maximized unearned incomes.

    “Jevons paradox” observes that technological gains in efficiency tend to be outpaced by demand to consume. The biggest threat to environmental sustainability is the insatiable appetite of the wealthy to consume. The most environmental choice is YES on Question 1 to stop the corridor.
  • Sandra Howard
    published this page in News 2021-10-22 21:55:37 -0400