WATCH: 'Yes on 1' campaign explains question origin and intentions

Click HERE to watch on News Center Maine.

AUGUSTA, Maine — This fall, Mainers are voting on a controversial referendum question aimed at stopping the New England Clean Energy Connect.

'Question 1' is 54 words and can be tricky to understand upon a first read. 

The question was initially presented to Mainers as a petition which received more than 80,000 signatures, more than enough for the Secretary of State to certify that it be on our ballots in November.

According to Secretary of State Shenna Bellows, the ballot question closely adheres to the language on the petition, including the hot button word "retroactive."

"Our office simply ensures the legislation meets statutory drafting requirements," Bellows said.

Bellows said 'Question 1' is an objective summary of the citizen's initiative petition. 

"The language on the ballot in November adheres as closely as possible to the intentions of the citizens who brought the question forward."

Question 1 reads: 

Do you want to ban the construction of high-impact electric transmission lines in the upper Kennebec region and to require the legislature to approve all other such projects anywhere in Maine, both retroactively to 2020, and to require the legislature, retroactively to 2014, to approve by a two-thirds vote such projects using public land?

Adam Cote, the lawyer representing the 'Yes on 1' campaign says the referendum's goal is narrow, stopping the New England Clean Energy Connect.

"The only project that I'm aware of in the state of Maine that this referendum would apply to is the CMP corridor," said Cote. 

In terms of whether this law would impact any private project, Cote said, "The two-thirds vote [by the Maine Legislature] is strictly on public land. The majority vote is if there is a massive construction project that goes over 50 miles, the legislature needs to vote majority on it."

As for the word "retroactive," the question calls for the legislature approval on "such projects" retroactively to 2020 and 2014.

2014 is when CMP entered into a lease agreement with the state of Maine, which a judge has now ruled to be faulty. 

RELATED: CMP and state agency appeal judge's ruling over NECEC corridor

RELATED: Ballot Question 1 explained

"So the purpose of writing it as 2014 is to make it unequivocally clear that it applies to the CMP corridor," said Cote. 

Retroactive to 2020, because that's when the "Yes on 1" campaign submitted the ballot petitions. 

Asked whether he thinks the fears regarding the "slippery slope" nature of retroactivity, Cote said people should recognize that it happens rarely. 

"I think it's incredibly rare when you have anything that happens retroactively. so if people are concerned this is going to apply to other projects, empower politicians to do things, that's not the case at all," said Cote. 

NEWS CENTER Maine reached out to two groups representing the 'No on 1' campaign, Mainers for Fair Laws and Clean Energy for Maine, to ask whether they are aware of any other projects this question would impact as well as its position on the "slippery slope" of retroactivity. We have not yet heard back. 

Election Day is Tuesday, November 2, 2021. Early voting begins 30 days before that, on October 4. 

Eligible voters can already request an absentee ballot.

Showing 1 reaction

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • Sandra Howard
    published this page in News 2021-09-28 07:40:47 -0400